What made me look differently?
HiTOP sees disorders not as separate entities, but as dimensions that coexist and influence each other . It is not about “having” or “not having” a disorder, but about where you are on a spectrum of emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
In the office, I began to notice how anxiety, avoidance, perfectionism, or poor emotional regulation are interconnected, forming a common structure – and HiTOP explains exactly this interconnection.
What’s new with the HiTOP model?
- Dimensional approach: assesses intensities, not just the presence or absence of symptoms.
- Hierarchical structure: links specific symptoms to broader domains such as internalizing or externalizing .
- Focus on comorbidity: explains why multiple disorders coexist – through common mechanisms, not by “coincidence”.
- Empirical foundation: it is based on massive statistical analyses, not theoretical consensus.
About Miri Forbes and why it mattered to me
Miri Forbes , a senior lecturer at Macquarie University (Australia) , is one of the researchers who transformed HiTOP from a theoretical idea into a solid scientific tool. Her research, based on tens of thousands of clinical cases, has shown that real symptoms do not respect the boundaries of the DSM, but rather cluster into hierarchical, interrelated dimensions .
I was impressed by the balance between rigor and clarity in her work—a science that never breaks away from people. Today, Forbes is a member of the international HiTOP team and an associate editor of the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science . Beyond the headlines, she brings something clinicians are always looking for: meaning and coherence to the complexity of mental suffering .
What I gained as a psychologist
Since I look at cases through the HiTOP lens:
- case formulations are clearer and more integrative ;
- assessments are finer – they see nuances, not labels;
- interventions are more personalized .
I often tell clients, “it’s not a disease that defines you, but a tendency that we can understand and adjust together.”
This perspective changes not only the language, but also the therapeutic relationship.
Conclusion
When I discovered the HiTOP model through the work of Miri Forbes, I felt I had found a more accurate map of psychopathology. HiTOP does not simplify, but adds depth—providing an empirical, human, and dynamic perspective on suffering.
For me, as a clinical psychologist, it was a reorientation from “disorders” to a continuum of understanding of the human .
Recommended bibliography
- Forbes, M. K., Wright, A. G. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2017). Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 969–988.
- Forbes, M. K., et al. (2025). A Hierarchical Model of the Symptom-Level Structure of Psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science.
- Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., et al. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477.
